Sunday, March 16, 2014
Modi's, BJP's, bravado: The decision to field Modi from Varanasi an empty gesture
There is then to need to look for other reasons for the BJP's decision to field from Varanasi. A very lame excuse is that if Modi contests from UP and from Varanasi the party would win 10 more seats than it would if he did not. That is, if the BJP is set to win 10 seats from the state as it did in 2009, then Modi contesting from UP would take the tally to 20. It is a rather strange, lame argument. If Modi the campaigner is able to charm the people everywhere in the country and he is going to increase the party's tally without fighting the election from any of the constituencies in those states, then he should be doing it in UP as well. That is, he should be able to win more seats for BJP in UP without contesting from the state.
The other part of the lame argument that is being put forward is that by fighting from Varanasi, he would have a ripple effect on the whole of eastern UP and parts of western Bihar. A bad argument again.
The real reason seems to be that Modi fighting the election to be prime minister of India from Varanasi is to send out the message that Modi the Hindu fighting from the Hindu city of Varanasi will bring the BJP, the Hindu party, to power. The BJP need not fight shy of flaunting its Hindu credentials because it desires to represent the majority Hindus. It is a legitimate desire. It can also argue that though it is a Hindu party it is not opposed to other religions in India. If Muslim League in pre-Independence India were to have come to power, then it would have remained a Muslim party without being hostile to Hindus. BJP is then in a similar position.
The BJP is shy of blatantly its Hindu identity at a time when so-called identity politics are the political fashion of the day. It wants to camouflage its Hindu identity politics under the rubric of nationalism, which is both cowardly and diabolical.
Modi's tacit Hindutva beliefs get a boost from fighting the election from Varanasi/Benaras/Kashi, the Hindu city of millennia. The stupid secularists would want to wade into the debate and talk about the Buddha's association with Kashi, and others would point to the presence of Musim weavers who have been living in the city from Kabir's times in the 14th century onwards, or to the example of the Benaras musician Ustad Bismillah Khan, who did not ever want to leave the city on the banks of Ganga. But it is not really the Varanasi of Muslim weavers and Kabir and Bismillah Khan along with that of ancient holiness and the illiterate and the lumpen brahmins known as pandas of the city. For a nice portrayal of the gangsterism of the pandas of Benaras, the 1968 Hindi film Sangharsh starring Dilip Kumar, Balraj Puri, Vyjayanthimala and Sanjeev Kumat and directed by H.L.Rawail, where the feuds and the violence of the Benaras pandas has been shown.
There is nothing innocent about Modi wanting to fight the Lok Sabha election from Varanasi. It would be futile to argue that he would lose the election. It is a case of lack of political integrity.
If the BJP-wallahs want to point out to the cases of Indira Gandhi fighting from Chikmagalur or from Medak, and Sonia Gandhi fighting from Bellary, then the answer is that both of them were on the look out for a safe seat and it was purely political in nature and there was nothing ideological about Chimagalur, Medak and Bellary. In the case of Modi fighting from Varanasi, it is more than political. It is ideological and it is an ideology of majoritarian Hindutva with all its religious connotations that is the reason behind BJP's and Modi's decision. The fact that neither Modi nor the BJP have the courage to confess to this aspect is an example of political pusillanimity.
Critics misread Alankrita Shrivastava's "Lipstick Under My Burkha" . It is not about feminism's liberation theology
I was reminded of Paul Haggis' 2004 film, "Crash" when I watched Alankrita Shrivastava's "Lipstick Under My Burkha&qu...
There is plenty to crib about Ashutosh Gowariker-directed Hrithik-Roshan-Pooja Hegde starrer Mohenjo-Daro with uninspiring music by the ove...
Udta Punjab, bad film because it is message-oriented, it is incoherent and loud, and the roles of Shahid Kapoor and Alia Bhatt were superfluousAbhishek Chaubey, the director of Udta Punjab , is part of the new school of film directors from Uttar Pradesh, which includes Tigmanshu Dh...
Eye in the Sky: A war movie with a difference which deals with the dilemmas of killing the enemy and saving the innocentsThis is a British production with a South African director, a top notch British actress Helen Mirren and a top notch British actor Alan Rick...