Sunday, May 17, 2015
Anurag Kashyap's Bombay Velvet is a cinematic disaster, but Kashyap would not mind it and that is the good thing
Despite his sincerity, his desire to do things his way, there can be no doubt that Kashyap's latest Bombay Velvet is a disaster. The film belongs to the 1950s rather than to the 1960s in its ambience. The Bombay smugglers and cheats and suit-bootwallahs had gone into their dirty safari suits in the 1960s. They did not wear hats, coats and ties and bow-ties, nor did the socialist tycoons/crooks wear suspenders. But Kashyap fancies the older, 1940s, 1950s Hollywood gangster movies look and he does not mind that it does not go with the Bombay of 1960s. If the viewer wants to get a glimpse of 1960s Bombay underworld, then he may have to go and see "Once Upon A Time In Mumbai, the 2010 film directed by Milan Luthria. So, Kashyap has made a purportedly 1960s period film about Bombay in the costumes of a few decades earlier. Kashyap is bothered about his aesthetic fancy and he is not apologetic about it.
Ranbir Kapoor, who was apparently very keen to do the lead role and literally begged Kashyap to give him that role, has really made the worst decision of his career. But he would not regret it because he gets to dress like his grandfather Raj Kapoor, though the hairstyle is different, the other gestures are an interesting imitation of the old star.
Anushka Sharma as Rosie, what else could she be?, is again an attempted throwback to an earlier undefined era, something that Madhubala performed to perfection in Shakti Samanta's Howra Bridge, the 1958 film with Ashok Kumar in the lead and a perfect noir film montage. Kashyap introduces a new element into this old role of Rosie. Operatic singing a la Anne Hathway in the musical Les Miserables, made in 2012, especially in that "Dhadaam" number.
Kashyap could have shown greater imagination and daring if he had probed the criminal corruption that was at the root of the making of Nariman Point and the World Trade Towers at Colaba. He hints at the murky goings-on that were behind the city's development of the new district, and that is what is exactly is at the heart of Bombay Velvet. But he wanted to do it in a stylised film, with a quirky and mordant sense of humour.
at May 17, 2015
Asghar Farhadi's Salesman, an understated complex movie that fails to come to terms with its own ccomplexity
On the face of it, Asghar Farhadi's Salesman , the winner of the 2017 Oscar for the Best Foreign Language film, appears to be an overwro...
Udta Punjab, bad film because it is message-oriented, it is incoherent and loud, and the roles of Shahid Kapoor and Alia Bhatt were superfluousAbhishek Chaubey, the director of Udta Punjab , is part of the new school of film directors from Uttar Pradesh, which includes Tigmanshu Dh...
There is plenty to crib about Ashutosh Gowariker-directed Hrithik-Roshan-Pooja Hegde starrer Mohenjo-Daro with uninspiring music by the ove...
The play was interspersed with his poetry, including from Shikwa and Jawab-E-Shikwa, but what holds the play is not the poetry but the almos...